<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Optimisation News &#187; Latest News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/category/latest-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news</link>
	<description>Latest SEO News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:59:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yahoo! and Twitter join forces</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/yahoo-and-twitter-join-forces/8101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/yahoo-and-twitter-join-forces/8101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro-blogging site Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! and Twitter strike up a partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! users will be able to access Twitter from their email]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! has signed a deal with the popular micro-blogging site Twitter which will see Yahoo! users able to access Twitter via a whole host of Yahoo! products.
It’s not unusual for search engines to partner up with social networking sites such as Twitter. Only last year Google and Microsoft’s Bing signed a deal with Twitter to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_82" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/yahoo_logo.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-82" title="yahoo_logo" src="http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/yahoo_logo-300x210.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yahoo! and Twitter embark on a new venture</p></div>
<p>Yahoo! has signed a deal with the popular micro-blogging site Twitter which will see Yahoo! users able to access Twitter via a whole host of Yahoo! products.</p>
<p>It’s not unusual for search engines to partner up with social networking sites such as Twitter. Only last year Google and Microsoft’s Bing signed a deal with Twitter to start indexing their updates on their search pages.</p>
<p>However the Yahoo! deal will go beyond simply indexing Twitter updates. Users of Yahoo! will be able to access their Twitter accounts from the company’s homepage, and from their Yahoo! email account, bridging the gap between social networking and other technology packages more than ever before.</p>
<p>Bosses at Yahoo! say the new venture will enable their customers to access their social networking pages more quickly and effectively by integrating Twitter services into several areas of the Yahoo! brand. Bryan Lamkin, senior vice president, consumer products group, Yahoo! described the new partnership as “simplifying people’s lives by bringing their social worlds — and the world —- together for easy access.”</p>
<p>How the service will work has not yet been revealed, neither is it known how much the deal between Yahoo! and Twitter has cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/yahoo-and-twitter-join-forces/8101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>60-70% of people will choose websites which rank in the natural search results</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/60-70-of-people-will-choose-websites-which-rank-in-the-natural-search-results/2301/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/60-70-of-people-will-choose-websites-which-rank-in-the-natural-search-results/2301/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a lot of emphasis put on natural search engine optimisation results and studies of how people use the internet have shown that between 60-70% of people will choose websites which rank in the natural results, over those displayed in the sponsored links, or the pay per click advertising.
The natural results are the ones [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of emphasis put on natural search engine optimisation results and studies of how people use the internet have shown that between 60-70% of people will choose websites which rank in the natural results, over those displayed in the sponsored links, or the pay per click advertising.</p>
<p>The natural results are the ones which have ranked highly because their sites are seen by the search engine to be the most useful, while the sponsored results have paid to be at the top. The studies of user habits would suggest that people realise that sponsored results have paid for their position but do the results transfer to real life?</p>
<p>Do you really choose the natural results which a search engine presents or do you go with the first site you see? Or maybe you try to choose the natural results but sometimes you just see a listing in the sponsored links which seems more relevant to what you were looking for, because let’s face it, there are times when Google can let you down too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/60-70-of-people-will-choose-websites-which-rank-in-the-natural-search-results/2301/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft introduces its brand new search engine, BING..</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/microsoft-introduces-its-brand-new-search-engine-bing/1501/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/microsoft-introduces-its-brand-new-search-engine-bing/1501/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google vs bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Bing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot off the heels of unveiling their protégée at the Wall Street Journal: All Things Digital conference in California last week, Microsoft launched their brand new search engine BING into the world 2 days earlier than planned.
BING is designed to take over from Microsoft’s current search engine Live Search, and its already being tipped as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp">Hot off the heels of unveiling their protégée at the Wall Street Journal: All Things Digital conference in California last week, <strong>Microsoft launched their brand new search engine BING</strong> into the world 2 days earlier than planned.</div>
<p><strong>BING</strong> is designed to take over from Microsoft’s current search engine Live Search, and its already being tipped as a dangerous contender for the mighty <a title="Google SEO" href="http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/google-seo.htm" target="_self">Google</a>. Early reviews of the site have been extremely encouraging. Bing differs from other search engines in as much it aims to give you less choice as opposed to more. It offers a more targeted results list, with the option of displaying further results. Instead of bombarding the user with a blanket response to questions BING provides a narrower but more select response to questions.</p>
<p>Another key feature of Bing is that instead of directing the user to an external site to view, for example, videos, listen to music, read articles, or shop online, it allows you to do all this without ever leaving Bing. It also offers an exclusive video search service as part of the package. In theory this should lead to greater ease of use and accessibility.</p>
<p>Whether or not Bing can rival the other major search engines such as Google and Yahoo remains to be seen. What is certain however is that the search engine as we know it is evolving, and that can only be good news for internet users the world over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/microsoft-introduces-its-brand-new-search-engine-bing/1501/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How often do you use Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/how-often-do-you-use-google/4101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/how-often-do-you-use-google/4101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google vs yellow pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds like a silly question when it seems like anytime you have a question, can’t remember an actor’s name or want to download a song, you turn to good old Google to find the answer for you. But have a second think and answer this – do you use it all the time, for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like a silly question when it seems like anytime you have a question, can’t remember an actor’s name or want to download a song, you turn to good old Google to find the answer for you. But have a second think and answer this – do you use it all the time, for every search, to find everything you are looking for on the wide, wide world on the web?</p>
<p>Now the yes doesn’t come so easily does it? No, I don’t use Google for everything either, not for every single thing because sometimes I feel like I would be better results if I looked somewhere else, in a different way. Depending on the product or service I’m looking for, before turning to Google, I’ll look in the Yellow Pages, or the local directory under the industry I am looking for.</p>
<p>Doing this kind of search I feel as though I get better results because rather than typing ‘graphic designer’ into Google and coming up with results for companies in Australia, companies which are either too big or too small for what I need, or just results which happen to have ‘graphic designer’ as the keywords, in the Yellow Pages I can judge the size of the companies by the size of the ads, and choose one in my area.</p>
<p>So does my search technique have a fatal flaw or do other people have this problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/how-often-do-you-use-google/4101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay as You Go Websites (Website Leasing) has Tax Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/pay-as-you-go-website-leasing-has-tax-benefits/3201/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/pay-as-you-go-website-leasing-has-tax-benefits/3201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay as You Go Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Leasing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Website leasing has great advantages for new and existing businesses to keep costs to a minimum and maintain better cash flow. Also many people are not aware that there are also &#8220;Tax Benefits of leasing a website&#8221; also known as pay as you go websites.
Leasing an asset is like renting it over a period in return [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Website leasing has great advantages for new and existing businesses to keep costs to a minimum and maintain <a href="http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/website-leasing/better-cash-flow.htm">better cash flow</a>. Also many people are not aware that there are also &#8220;Tax Benefits of leasing a website&#8221; also known as pay as you go websites.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-33" src="http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/tax-money-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" />Leasing an asset is like renting it over a period in return for fixed rental payments. Many UK businesses take advantage of leasing.</p>
<p>Renting or leasing assets can be tax efficient &#8211; this can reduce your overall tax bill, as the <strong>cost is deductible</strong> as a business expense. This is a factor in determining whether you should rent or lease an asset, rather than buy.</p>
<p>Here are some other points to consider when leasing:</p>
<ul>
<li>You do not bear the risk that, when you have finished with the asset, its value has decreased below the amount you paid for it.</li>
<li>The asset can often be replaced by a newer one, by upgrading at little or no extra cost.</li>
<li>You do not have to find a large cash deposit.</li>
</ul>
<p>Visit this page for more information about <a href="http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/website-leasing/">website leasing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/pay-as-you-go-website-leasing-has-tax-benefits/3201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search engines were severely manipulated in the 90s</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/search-engines-were-severely-manipulated-in-the-90s/2601/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/search-engines-were-severely-manipulated-in-the-90s/2601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulate search engine rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s a lot of crap on the internet isn’t there so I can see why you’d assume that SEO keyword articles are just more crap. And not just any old crap, crap to manipulate search engine rankings, so can you trust SEO articles?
Well yes, by their nature you can trust them. The very fact that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s a lot of crap on the internet isn’t there so I can see why you’d assume that SEO keyword articles are just more crap. And not just any old crap, crap to <strong>manipulate search engine rankings</strong>, so can you trust SEO articles?</p>
<p>Well yes, by their nature you can trust them. The very fact that they exist and that you have found them means you can trust them because if they were crap, you wouldn’t have found them because the search engine wouldn’t have directed you to them because the search engine is there to protect you from crap.</p>
<p>During the late 1990s search engines were severely manipulated by crap which people thought would help their sites rank better. Well the search engines have learnt their lessons from those ‘dark ages’ and makes a point to ignore crap, ensuring that the sites, the SEO articles and the information which ranks where you can find it, is useful, correct and pertinent to your search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimisation.eu/news/search-engines-were-severely-manipulated-in-the-90s/2601/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
